Hydrogen is promoted as a clean fuel for everything, and this category asks where it actually makes sense. Our posts look at the physics and the economics: the carbon intensity of hydrogen, why hydrogen is itself a greenhouse gas, the problems of storing and transporting it, and the cost of electrolyzers. Many posts conclude that hydrogen for cars, buses, trains, motorcycles and home heating loses to batteries and direct electricity, and that unrealistic 2030 goals and billions of dollars of public money deserve scrutiny.
We do not dismiss hydrogen entirely. Posts also explore green hydrogen opportunities and progress from Fortescue, new technologies for cheaper hydrogen, geologic or gold hydrogen, and where hydrogen could replace fossil fuels in heavy industry. The aim is to separate myths from real opportunities.
Other articles examine Australia’s hydrogen superpower vision, the failure of hydrogen strategies at car makers such as Stellantis, a dead end in China, and expert views distilled from Dr Paul Martin. If you need a clear, evidence-based view of the hydrogen debate and the places it may truly be needed, start here.